linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/vt-d: Implement set_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <797fec71-67d5-6420-3b2b-7056095d4bb7@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:22:50 +0800
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/vt-d: Implement set_dev_pasid domain op

On 3/28/23 11:40 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:47:45 +0000, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 7:22 AM
>>>
>>> Devices that use ENQCMDS to submit work on buffers mapped by DMA API
>>> must attach a PASID to the default domain of the device. In preparation
>>> for this use case, this patch implements set_dev_pasid() for the
>>> default_domain_ops. Besides PASID attachment, device will also be
>>> attached to the domain as the result of this call if the device has not
>>> been attached before.
>>>    
>>
>> I didn't get the last point. PASID attach should only have the scope
>> for the pasid. RID of the device might be attached to another domain
>> which shouldn't be changed by this call.
> I meant if the RID context has not been set up before attaching this PASID,
> this call will also set up the context, PASID dir etc. In the end, we
> eliminated ordering requirement of attaching device, RID_PASID first, then
> other PASIDs.

This occurs in default domain deferred attaching case.

> How about:
> "If the device context has not been set up prior to this call, this will
> set up the device context in addition to PASID attachment."

Best regards,
baolu