[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230329071146.GD7701@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:11:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf sched: sync task state macros with kernel
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:52:02AM +0800, Ze Gao wrote:
> commit 8ef9925b02c2 ("sched/debug: Add explicit TASK_PARKED printing")
> changes some task state macros, this patch makes perf-sched in sync
>
Why does perf care? Where do we export raw state values?
That is, I really don't like this being ABI...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists