linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: fix bitmask for length in command word

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230329093145.52790647@xps-13>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:31:45 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
        Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
        <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: fix bitmask for length in
 command word

Hello,

avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:12:10 +0300:

> On 28.03.2023 23:25, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Hi Arseniy,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 8:39 PM Arseniy Krasnov
> > <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> > [...]  
> >>>
> >>> By the way any reason not to have Cc'ed stable?  
> >>
> >> Sorry, what do You mean? I've included linux-mtd mailing lists, there is
> >> one more list for mtd reviews? I will appreciate if You can point me  
> > "stable" typically refers to the stable tree where fixes for already
> > released kernel versions are maintained.
> > When Miquel applies the patch it will either land in the next -rc of
> > the current development cycle (typically applies to fixes - currently
> > 6.3-rc5) or -rc1 of the next kernel version (typically applies to new
> > features, cleanups, etc. - currently 6.4-rc1).
> > 
> > Let's say you are fixing a bug now but want the fix to be included in
> > 6.1 LTS (long term stable) or other stable release.
> > In this case it's recommended to Cc the maintainers of the stable
> > trees as part of your patch, see [0].
> > That way once the commit with your fix hits Linus Torvalds linux tree
> > it will be backported by the stable team within a few days (assuming
> > of course that the patch applies cleanly to older versions, if not
> > they're notifying you).
> > Note: even without Cc'ing the stable maintainers your commit may be
> > backported (semi-automatically) if it has a Fixes tag and the stable
> > maintainers find your commit. But my understanding is that it's
> > easiest for them if they're explicitly Cc'ed on the patch.
> > 
> > I hope this makes sense. If not: don't hesitate to ask.  

That is an excellent summary, I should copy/paste it sometimes :)

> 
> Hello! Thanks for this detailed explanation, that really helps!

So IOW, I am asking you to send a v2 with an additional line in the
commit, right next "Fixes":

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org

Thanks,
Miquèl