linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/17] sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF like policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:12:39 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
        qyousef@...alina.io, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
        patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, pjt@...gle.com, pavel@....cz,
        qperret@...gle.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, timj@....org,
        kprateek.nayak@....com, yu.c.chen@...el.com,
        youssefesmat@...omium.org, joel@...lfernandes.org, efault@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF like policy

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:26:51PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:

> > @@ -5088,19 +5307,20 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
> >  static void
> >  check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
> >  {
> > -       unsigned long ideal_runtime, delta_exec;
> > +       unsigned long delta_exec;
> >         struct sched_entity *se;
> >         s64 delta;
> >
> > -       /*
> > -        * When many tasks blow up the sched_period; it is possible that
> > -        * sched_slice() reports unusually large results (when many tasks are
> > -        * very light for example). Therefore impose a maximum.
> > -        */
> > -       ideal_runtime = min_t(u64, sched_slice(cfs_rq, curr), sysctl_sched_latency);
> > +       if (sched_feat(EEVDF)) {
> > +               if (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) != curr)
> > +                       goto preempt;
> 
> This could shortcircuit the loop in pick_eevdf once we find a best
> that has less vruntime and sooner deadline than curr, since we know
> we'll never pick curr in that case. Might help performance when we
> have a large tree for this cfs_rq.

Yeah, one of the things I did consider was having this set cfs_rq->next
such that the reschedule pick doesn't have to do the pick again. But I
figured keep things simple for now.