Message-ID: <fd175fb1-0990-fc7a-8697-45dc0d3e6199@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:37:44 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 217252 - warning: v4l_enum_fmt+0x125a/0x1c20 -
 Unknown pixelformat 0x00000000

Hi,

On 3/29/23 13:25, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker.
> 
> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
> kernel developers don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by mail.
> 
> Note, you have to use bugzilla to reach the reporter, as I sadly[1] can
> not CCed them to mails like this.
> 
> Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217252 :

This is fixed by this (pending) patch:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20230327091051.404184-1-hpa@redhat.com/

Regards,

Hans




> 
>>  sander44 2023-03-27 12:50:47 UTC
>>
>> Hi Kernel Team,
>>
>> I try today to rebuild kernel 6.1.21, but i notice error with: v4l2-core.
>>
>> [    3.722510] loop17: detected capacity change from 0 to 8
>> [    3.920014] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [    3.920016] Unknown pixelformat 0x00000000
>> [    3.920024] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1558 at drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:1503 v4l_enum_fmt+0x125a/0x1c20
>> [    3.920030] Modules linked in: [...]
>> [    3.920097] CPU: 2 PID: 1558 Comm: pipewire Tainted: G     U             6.1.21-1-lowlatency #2
>> [    3.920099] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC12WSKi7/NUC12WSBi7, BIOS WSADL357.0073.2022.0302.1157 03/02/2022
>> [    3.920100] RIP: 0010:v4l_enum_fmt+0x125a/0x1c20
>> [    3.920102] Code: 48 c7 c3 53 29 ca 83 81 fe 64 76 73 64 0f 84 d7 ef ff ff 41 80 7d 0c 00 0f 85 9e ee ff ff 48 c7 c7 5a 37 ca 83 e8 36 9c 48 ff <0f> 0b 48 c7 c2 76 37 ca 83 49 8d 4d 2c 49 8d 7d 0c be 20 00 00 00
>> [    3.920103] RSP: 0018:ffffa60086907bd8 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> [    3.920104] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff83ca33fb RCX: 0000000000000000
>> [    3.920105] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
>> [    3.920106] RBP: ffffa60086907c08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>> [    3.920106] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
>> [    3.920107] R13: ffffa60086907d00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff98efc87d0018
>> [    3.920107] FS:  00007f7f99022740(0000) GS:ffff98f347680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [    3.920108] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [    3.920109] CR2: 00007ffc3f1c3ff8 CR3: 0000000121ab8006 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
>> [    3.920110] PKRU: 55555554
>> [    3.920110] Call Trace:
>> [    3.920111]  <TASK>
>> [    3.920114]  __video_do_ioctl+0x1e7/0x590
>> [    3.920116]  ? __video_do_ioctl+0x1e7/0x590
>> [    3.920118]  video_usercopy+0x25d/0x820
>> [    3.920119]  ? v4l_print_control+0x30/0x30
>> [    3.920121]  video_ioctl2+0x15/0x30
>> [    3.920122]  v4l2_ioctl+0x69/0xb0
>> [    3.920124]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x9f/0xe0
>> [    3.920126]  do_syscall_64+0x58/0x90
>> [    3.920128]  ? video_ioctl2+0x15/0x30
>> [    3.920129]  ? v4l2_ioctl+0x69/0xb0
>> [    3.920131]  ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x39/0x190
>> [    3.920133]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x29/0x50
>> [    3.920135]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x90
>> [    3.920136]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x29/0x50
>> [    3.920137]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x90
>> [    3.920138]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x90
>> [    3.920139]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x90
>> [    3.920140]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>> [    3.920142] RIP: 0033:0x7f7f98d1aaff
>> [    3.920143] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <41> 89 c0 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1f 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00
>> [    3.920144] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6fcb2810 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>> [    3.920145] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000023 RCX: 00007f7f98d1aaff
>> [    3.920146] RDX: 000055f9945f309c RSI: ffffffffc0405602 RDI: 0000000000000023
>> [    3.920147] RBP: 000055f9945f309c R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
>> [    3.920147] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000ffffffff
>> [    3.920148] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000004000015c R15: 000055f9945f2ec8
>> [    3.920149]  </TASK>
>> [    3.920150] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>
>> [...]
> 
> See the ticket for more details.
> 
> Note, to my untrained eyes this looked like something that is caused by
> the driver, which afaics is uvcvideo. Hope that wasn't a mistake.
> 
> 
> [TLDR for the rest of this mail: I'm adding this report to the list of
> tracked Linux kernel regressions; the text you find below is based on a
> few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar
> form.]
> 
> BTW, let me use this mail to also add the report to the list of tracked
> regressions to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks:
> 
> #regzbot introduced: v5.15..v6.1.21
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217252
> #regzbot title: media: Unknown pixelformat 0x00000000
> #regzbot ignore-activity
> 
> This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
> discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
> the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
> something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
> while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
> the footer of this mail.
> 
> Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
> to the report (e.g. the buzgzilla ticket and maybe this mail as well, if
> this thread sees some discussion). See page linked in footer for details.
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
> 
> [1] because bugzilla.kernel.org tells users upon registration their
> "email address will never be displayed to logged out users"
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists