[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCRNRhI3+6jUbqvy@Gentoo>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:37:58 +0800
From: Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@...il.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Simon Trimmer <simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Asoc: wm_adsp: Add support for loading firmware with
prefix name
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:05:24PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> This direction seems slightly problematic, especially in the
> context of amps (which I presume this relates to, please let know
> if that is wrong). It would probably be better to be fixing
> things up such that the amp in question sets system_name when
> registered through DT. Generally speaking the idea is the amp
I also consider setting system_name when registered by DT, but I don't
known setting what name to it. Card name or something else?
> tuning is going to be specific to the enclosure/speaker involved,
> so a generic tuning for say left amps doesn't really make a lot
> of sense.
I don't known about amp tuning much, my need just is loading firmware for
more than 1 speaker amp at the platform using fdt.
One of the both way is good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists