[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b103196-68d0-4d42-aa66-779af4d78532@kili.mountain>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:44:42 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [PATCH RFC v2] selftests/firmware: copious kernel memory
leaks in test_fw_run_batch_request()
I admire your enthusiam. :) What about if we just did this? Does it
help with the leaks?
regards,
dan carpenter
diff --git a/lib/test_firmware.c b/lib/test_firmware.c
index 05ed84c2fc4c..626b836895f4 100644
--- a/lib/test_firmware.c
+++ b/lib/test_firmware.c
@@ -895,6 +895,9 @@ static ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_store(struct device *dev,
mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
+ if (test_fw_config->reqs)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
test_fw_config->reqs =
vzalloc(array3_size(sizeof(struct test_batched_req),
test_fw_config->num_requests, 2));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists