lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230330160818.3107545-1-peterx@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:08:18 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, peterx@...hat.com,
        Leonardo Bras Soares Passos <lsoaresp@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 21/29] selftests/mm: Add framework for uffd-unit-test

Add a framework to be prepared to move unit tests from uffd-stress.c into
uffd-unit-tests.c.  The goal is to allow detection of uffd features for
each test, and also loop over specified types of memory that a test support.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c         |  27 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h         |   1 +
 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
index dfb44ffad5f5..007145063363 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
@@ -9,6 +9,66 @@
 
 #ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
 
+/* The unit test doesn't need a large or random size, make it 32MB for now */
+#define  UFFD_TEST_MEM_SIZE               (32UL << 20)
+
+#define  MEM_ANON                         BIT_ULL(0)
+#define  MEM_SHMEM                        BIT_ULL(1)
+#define  MEM_SHMEM_PRIVATE                BIT_ULL(2)
+#define  MEM_HUGETLB                      BIT_ULL(3)
+#define  MEM_HUGETLB_PRIVATE              BIT_ULL(4)
+
+struct mem_type {
+	const char *name;
+	unsigned int mem_flag;
+	uffd_test_ops_t *mem_ops;
+	bool shared;
+};
+typedef struct mem_type mem_type_t;
+
+mem_type_t mem_types[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "anon",
+		.mem_flag = MEM_ANON,
+		.mem_ops = &anon_uffd_test_ops,
+		.shared = false,
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "shmem",
+		.mem_flag = MEM_SHMEM,
+		.mem_ops = &shmem_uffd_test_ops,
+		.shared = true,
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "shmem-private",
+		.mem_flag = MEM_SHMEM_PRIVATE,
+		.mem_ops = &shmem_uffd_test_ops,
+		.shared = false,
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "hugetlb",
+		.mem_flag = MEM_HUGETLB,
+		.mem_ops = &hugetlb_uffd_test_ops,
+		.shared = true,
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "hugetlb-private",
+		.mem_flag = MEM_HUGETLB_PRIVATE,
+		.mem_ops = &hugetlb_uffd_test_ops,
+		.shared = false,
+	},
+};
+
+/* Returns: UFFD_TEST_* */
+typedef void (*uffd_test_fn)(void);
+
+typedef struct {
+	const char *name;
+	uffd_test_fn uffd_fn;
+	unsigned int mem_targets;
+	uint64_t uffd_feature_required;
+} uffd_test_case_t;
+
 struct {
 	unsigned int pass, skip, fail, total;
 } uffd_test_acct;
@@ -108,9 +168,50 @@ static int test_uffd_api(bool use_dev)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This function initializes the global variables.  TODO: remove global
+ * vars and then remove this.
+ */
+static int uffd_setup_environment(uffd_test_case_t *test, mem_type_t *mem_type)
+{
+	map_shared = mem_type->shared;
+	uffd_test_ops = mem_type->mem_ops;
+
+	if (mem_type->mem_flag & (MEM_HUGETLB_PRIVATE | MEM_HUGETLB))
+		page_size = default_huge_page_size();
+	else
+		page_size = psize();
+
+	nr_pages = UFFD_TEST_MEM_SIZE / page_size;
+	/* TODO: remove this global var.. it's so ugly */
+	nr_cpus = 1;
+
+	return uffd_test_ctx_init(test->uffd_feature_required);
+}
+
+static bool uffd_feature_supported(uffd_test_case_t *test)
+{
+	uint64_t features;
+
+	if (uffd_get_features(&features))
+		return false;
+
+	return (features & test->uffd_feature_required) ==
+	    test->uffd_feature_required;
+}
+
+uffd_test_case_t uffd_tests[] = {
+};
+
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
+	int n_tests = sizeof(uffd_tests) / sizeof(uffd_test_case_t);
+	int n_mems = sizeof(mem_types) / sizeof(mem_type_t);
+	uffd_test_case_t *test;
+	mem_type_t *mem_type;
+	char test_name[128];
 	int has_uffd;
+	int i, j;
 
 	has_uffd = test_uffd_api(false);
 	has_uffd |= test_uffd_api(true);
@@ -119,7 +220,31 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 		printf("Userfaultfd not supported or unprivileged, skip all tests\n");
 		exit(KSFT_SKIP);
 	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n_tests; i++) {
+		test = &uffd_tests[i];
+		for (j = 0; j < n_mems; j++) {
+			mem_type = &mem_types[j];
+			if (!(test->mem_targets & mem_type->mem_flag))
+				continue;
+			snprintf(test_name, sizeof(test_name),
+				 "%s on %s", test->name, mem_type->name);
+
+			uffd_test_start(test_name);
+			if (!uffd_feature_supported(test)) {
+				uffd_test_skip("feature missing");
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (uffd_setup_environment(test, mem_type)) {
+				uffd_test_skip("memory allocation failed");
+				continue;
+			}
+			test->uffd_fn();
+		}
+	}
+
 	uffd_test_report();
+
 	return uffd_test_acct.fail ? KSFT_FAIL : KSFT_PASS;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
index 62fcf039d6b7..dad1f62a7ecd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
@@ -264,3 +264,30 @@ int uffd_open(unsigned int flags)
 
 	return uffd;
 }
+
+int uffd_get_features(uint64_t *features)
+{
+	struct uffdio_api uffdio_api = { .api = UFFD_API, .features = 0 };
+	/*
+	 * This should by default work in most kernels; the feature list
+	 * will be the same no matter what we pass in here.
+	 */
+	int fd = uffd_open(UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY);
+
+	if (fd < 0)
+		/* Maybe the kernel is older than user-only mode? */
+		fd = uffd_open(0);
+
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return fd;
+
+	if (ioctl(fd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api)) {
+		close(fd);
+		return -errno;
+	}
+
+	*features = uffdio_api.features;
+	close(fd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
index a67db8432855..2edad3256271 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ int uffd_open(unsigned int flags);
 int uffd_register(int uffd, void *addr, uint64_t len,
 		  bool miss, bool wp, bool minor);
 int uffd_unregister(int uffd, void *addr, uint64_t len);
+int uffd_get_features(uint64_t *features);
 
 /*
  * On ppc64 this will only work with radix 2M hugepage size
-- 
2.39.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ