[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230330035930.lv5bz43bkbdfnbhm@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:29:30 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] qcom-cpufreq-hw binding improvements
On 08-03-23, 02:26, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> This series tries to better sanitize what's actually allowed on which
> SoC and lowers the minimum frequency domain count to 1, as that's what's
> present on at least QCM2290.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> Konrad Dybcio (8):
> dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Allow just 1 frequency domain
> dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Sanitize data per compatible
> dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add QCM2290
Applied these three, thanks..
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists