linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: Exclude KUnit config dot-files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875yaifacb.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:55:00 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...hat.com>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: Exclude KUnit config dot-files

Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> writes:

Hello Daniel,

> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:27 AM Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> There's a rule to ignore all the dot-files (.*) but we want to exclude the
>> config files used by KUnit (.kunitconfig) since those are usually added to
>> allow executing test suites without having to enable custom config symbols.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
>
> FYI, Andy has a version of this patch from back in Jan here,
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230127145708.12915-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
>
> I don't think anyone was adamantly opposed to it, but it's just been
> sitting on the list waiting.
>

Thanks. I missed that there was a patch posted already by Andy.

Masahiro-san,

Could you please pick that? It would not only facilitate adding new KUnit
test suites but also avoid existing reports sent by the kernel robot, i.e:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CAGS_qxot1_+J3YCykkk0H1fZM6Cn6Pv4SFT6iCf9J7td1aH9HQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#mfcce95444b2df1c8242b03b7434e7730a6087663

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat