[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5HFP-1SFFBsUneyVT-42b3_6BPtQ-CkULmUT6v0pUoLbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:11:18 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add generic-display-mux driver and bindings
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:10 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 4:47 PM Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > This series is developed for and tested on MT8173 board, and the layout is:
> >
> > /-- anx7688
> > -- MT8173 HDMI bridge -- GPIO mux
> > \-- native HDMI
>
> What is the part number of this GPIO mux? Does mux gpio interrupt
> based and able to switch output HDMI and DP. If so, how this gpio
> interrupt is different than the HPD in native HDMI? I mean does HPD
> have any detection bottlenecks with mux gpio interrupt?
It's a full blown HDMI 1:2 demultiplexer, so DDC and HPD signals are muxed
as well. The anx7688 handles all the Type-C stuff, and our EC talks to it.
If HDMI output from the SoC needs to be muxed over for DP alt-mode, the EC
will signal the SoC.
> I do have GPIO Mux that input DSI and two outputs DMD/HDMI Input and
> HDMI Out. 2x1 with 1x2 mux.
>
> I'm thinking having a generic mux to select the specific out number of
> outputs with associated interface outputs can be a viable solution to
> address all use cases here.
AFAIK DRM doesn't allow dynamically changing the constitution of a display
pipeline, so it doesn't really work out for us.
If you're just muxing between different outputs with passive/dumb bridges,
it may still work for you.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists