linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mcq: Limit the amount of inflight requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:28:53 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
        "quic_cang@...cinc.com" <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mcq: Limit the amount of inflight requests

 
> On 30.03.23 15:11, Avri Altman wrote:
> > +	if (WARN_ONCE(hba->nutrs * hba->nr_hw_queues > (1 << 16) - 1,
> > +		     "there can be at most 1<<16 inflight requests\n"))
> > +		goto err;
> 
> Hmm why not SZ_64K - 1?
But of course.

Thanks,
Avri