linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] vsock/vmci: convert VMCI error code to -ENOMEM on receive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:49:12 +0000
From:   Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
CC:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
        Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel@...rdevices.ru" <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
        "oxffffaa@...il.com" <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
        Pv-drivers <Pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] vsock/vmci: convert VMCI error code to -ENOMEM
 on receive



> On Mar 30, 2023, at 1:18 PM, Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> 
> !! External Email
> 
> On 30.03.2023 23:13, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds conversion of VMCI specific error code to general -ENOMEM. It
>> is needed, because af_vsock.c passes error value returned from transport
>> to the user, which does not expect to get VMCI_ERROR_* values.
> 
> @Stefano, I have some doubts about this commit message, as it says "... af_vsock.c
> passes error value returned from transport to the user ...", but this
> behaviour is implemented only in the next patch. Is it ok, if both patches
> are in a single patchset?
> 
> For patch 1 I think it is ok, as it fixes current implementation.
> 
> Thanks, Arseniy
> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>

Code change looks good to me.  Will let you figure out the commit message
with Stefano. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>

>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 11 +++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>> index 95cc4d79ba29..b370070194fa 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
>> @@ -1831,10 +1831,17 @@ static ssize_t vmci_transport_stream_dequeue(
>>      size_t len,
>>      int flags)
>> {
>> +     ssize_t err;
>> +
>>      if (flags & MSG_PEEK)
>> -             return vmci_qpair_peekv(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>> +             err = vmci_qpair_peekv(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>>      else
>> -             return vmci_qpair_dequev(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>> +             err = vmci_qpair_dequev(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0);
>> +
>> +     if (err < 0)
>> +             err = -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +     return err;
>> }
>> 
>> static ssize_t vmci_transport_stream_enqueue(
> 
> !! External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.