| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230330164050.0069e2a5.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:40:50 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: jgg@...dia.com, yishaih@...dia.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, darwi@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
dave.jiang@...el.com, jing2.liu@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] vfio/pci: Support dynamic MSI-x
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:53:34 -0700
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com> wrote:
> Recently introduced pci_msix_alloc_irq_at() and pci_msix_free_irq()
> enables an individual MSI-X index to be allocated and freed after
> MSI-X enabling.
>
> Support dynamic MSI-X if supported by the device. Keep the association
> between allocated interrupt and vfio interrupt context. Allocate new
> context together with the new interrupt if no interrupt context exist
> for an MSI-X interrupt. Similarly, release an interrupt with its
> context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC V1:
> - Add pointer to interrupt context as function parameter to
> vfio_irq_ctx_free(). (Alex)
> - Initialize new_ctx to false. (Dan Carpenter)
> - Only support dynamic allocation if device supports it. (Alex)
>
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> index b3a258e58625..755b752ca17e 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,13 @@ struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *vfio_irq_ctx_get(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> return xa_load(&vdev->ctx, index);
> }
>
> +static void vfio_irq_ctx_free(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> + struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx, unsigned long index)
> +{
> + xa_erase(&vdev->ctx, index);
> + kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
> static void vfio_irq_ctx_free_all(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> {
> struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx;
> @@ -409,33 +416,62 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx *ctx;
> + struct msi_map msix_map = {};
> + bool allow_dyn_alloc = false;
> struct eventfd_ctx *trigger;
> + bool new_ctx = false;
> int irq, ret;
> u16 cmd;
>
> + /* Only MSI-X allows dynamic allocation. */
> + if (msix && pci_msix_can_alloc_dyn(vdev->pdev))
> + allow_dyn_alloc = true;
Should vfio-pci-core probe this and store it in a field on
vfio_pci_core_device so that we can simply use something like
vdev->has_dyn_msix throughout?
> +
> ctx = vfio_irq_ctx_get(vdev, vector);
> - if (!ctx)
> + if (!ctx && !allow_dyn_alloc)
> return -EINVAL;
> +
> irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + /* Context and interrupt are always allocated together. */
> + WARN_ON((ctx && irq == -EINVAL) || (!ctx && irq != -EINVAL));
>
> - if (ctx->trigger) {
> + if (ctx && ctx->trigger) {
> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&ctx->producer);
>
> cmd = vfio_pci_memory_lock_and_enable(vdev);
> free_irq(irq, ctx->trigger);
> + if (allow_dyn_alloc) {
It almost seems easier to define msix_map in each scope that it's used:
struct msi_map map = { .index = vector,
.virq = irq };
> + msix_map.index = vector;
> + msix_map.virq = irq;
> + pci_msix_free_irq(pdev, msix_map);
> + irq = -EINVAL;
> + }
> vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
> kfree(ctx->name);
> eventfd_ctx_put(ctx->trigger);
> ctx->trigger = NULL;
> + if (allow_dyn_alloc) {
> + vfio_irq_ctx_free(vdev, ctx, vector);
> + ctx = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> if (fd < 0)
> return 0;
>
> + if (!ctx) {
> + ctx = vfio_irq_ctx_alloc_single(vdev, vector);
> + if (!ctx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + new_ctx = true;
> + }
> +
> ctx->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, "vfio-msi%s[%d](%s)",
> msix ? "x" : "", vector, pci_name(pdev));
> - if (!ctx->name)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!ctx->name) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_ctx;
> + }
>
> trigger = eventfd_ctx_fdget(fd);
> if (IS_ERR(trigger)) {
> @@ -443,25 +479,38 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> goto out_free_name;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * The MSIx vector table resides in device memory which may be cleared
> - * via backdoor resets. We don't allow direct access to the vector
> - * table so even if a userspace driver attempts to save/restore around
> - * such a reset it would be unsuccessful. To avoid this, restore the
> - * cached value of the message prior to enabling.
> - */
> cmd = vfio_pci_memory_lock_and_enable(vdev);
> if (msix) {
> - struct msi_msg msg;
> -
> - get_cached_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> - pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> + if (irq == -EINVAL) {
> + msix_map = pci_msix_alloc_irq_at(pdev, vector, NULL);
struct msi_map map = pci_msix_alloc_irq_at(pdev,
vector, NULL);
> + if (msix_map.index < 0) {
> + vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
> + ret = msix_map.index;
> + goto out_put_eventfd_ctx;
> + }
> + irq = msix_map.virq;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * The MSIx vector table resides in device memory which
> + * may be cleared via backdoor resets. We don't allow
> + * direct access to the vector table so even if a
> + * userspace driver attempts to save/restore around
> + * such a reset it would be unsuccessful. To avoid
> + * this, restore the cached value of the message prior
> + * to enabling.
> + */
You've only just copied this comment down to here, but I think it's a
bit stale. Maybe we should update it to something that helps explain
this split better, maybe:
/*
* If the vector was previously allocated, refresh the
* on-device message data before enabling in case it had
* been cleared or corrupted since writing.
*/
IIRC, that was the purpose of writing it back to the device and the
blocking of direct access is no longer accurate anyway.
> + struct msi_msg msg;
> +
> + get_cached_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> + pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> + }
> }
>
> ret = request_irq(irq, vfio_msihandler, 0, ctx->name, trigger);
> - vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_put_eventfd_ctx;
> + goto out_free_irq_locked;
> +
> + vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
>
> ctx->producer.token = trigger;
> ctx->producer.irq = irq;
> @@ -477,11 +526,21 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
>
> return 0;
>
> +out_free_irq_locked:
> + if (allow_dyn_alloc && new_ctx) {
struct msi_map map = { .index = vector,
.virq = irq };
> + msix_map.index = vector;
> + msix_map.virq = irq;
> + pci_msix_free_irq(pdev, msix_map);
> + }
> + vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(vdev, cmd);
> out_put_eventfd_ctx:
> eventfd_ctx_put(trigger);
> out_free_name:
> kfree(ctx->name);
> ctx->name = NULL;
> +out_free_ctx:
> + if (allow_dyn_alloc && new_ctx)
> + vfio_irq_ctx_free(vdev, ctx, vector);
> return ret;
> }
>
Do we really need the new_ctx test in the above cases? Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists