[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230330-quickly-slinky-06d441dbb61b@brauner>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 07:14:04 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: consolidate dt_type() helper definitions
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:03:40AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > - v9fs_qid2ino(&st.qid), dt_type(&st));
> > + v9fs_qid2ino(&st.qid), v9fs_dt_type(&st));
>
> This adds an overly long line. Also renaming the v9fs dt_type seems
> like it should be a prep patch.
>
> > +/* Relationship between i_mode and the DT_xxx types */
>
> This comment seems a bit terse.
Agreed. Would be nice if we could just do proper kernel doc. Even for
static inline functions it can't hurt.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists