[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230330084123.GBZCVLM8Wz8fBsKr7z@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:41:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"mario.limonciello@....com" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"eric.devolder@...cle.com" <eric.devolder@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/boot: Use FADT version to check support for
online capable
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:10:07AM +0000, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> In https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_2.pdf,
> MADT revision is 4.
>
> In
> https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI%206_2_A_Sept29.pdf,
> MADT revision is 45.
This is a hack to fix some ACPI erratum or whatever.
> In
> https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_2_B_final_Jan30.pdf
> MADT revision is 5.
>
> So you probably mean 6.2a has MADT revision "45" here?
No, forget MADT.
The thing should check whether the ACPI revision is 6.3. And this is
what it does below.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists