[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cec30bcb-85d2-5de0-186b-6838ce94e3f7@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:25:59 +0800
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
To: Mårten Lindahl <marten.lindahl@...s.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Free memory for tmpfile name
Hi Mårten,
> When opening a ubifs tmpfile on an encrypted directory, function
> fscrypt_setup_filename allocates memory for the name that is to be
> stored in the directory entry, but after the name has been copied to the
> directory entry inode, the memory is not freed.
>
> When running kmemleak on it we see that it is registered as a leak. The
> report below is triggered by a simple program 'tmpfile' just opening a
> tmpfile:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88810178f380 (size 32):
> comm "tmpfile", pid 509, jiffies 4294934744 (age 1524.742s)
> backtrace:
> __kmem_cache_alloc_node
> __kmalloc
> fscrypt_setup_filename
> ubifs_tmpfile
> vfs_tmpfile
> path_openat
>
> Free this memory after it has been copied to the inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mårten Lindahl <marten.lindahl@...s.com>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/dir.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> index 0f29cf201136..089ca6910124 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int ubifs_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir,
> goto out_cancel;
> unlock_2_inodes(dir, inode);
>
> + fscrypt_free_filename(&nm);
> ubifs_release_budget(c, &req);
>
> return finish_open_simple(file, 0);
Looks good, just one small nit. I'd prefer to add
fscrypt_free_filename() after ubifs_release_budget() just like
ubifs_create/link does, so that ubifs can get unused budget earlier.
After looking through the code, I found another place create_whiteout
has the same problem(Imported in 278d9a243635f26c05("ubifs: Rename
whiteout atomically") by me). Would you mind fixing this point just by
removing unused 'nm' in create_whiteout()?
>
> ---
> base-commit: c9c3395d5e3dcc6daee66c6908354d47bf98cb0c
> change-id: 20230329-memleak-fix-87a01daf469e
>
> Best regards,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists