linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/18] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: add compatible for pmm8654au

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230330140059.GA489249@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:00:59 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/18] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: add
 compatible for pmm8654au

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:13 PM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2023, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > PMM8654au is the SPMI PMIC variant used on sa8775p-ride. Add a compatible
> > > for it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Change-log?
> >
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> > > index 975c30aad23c..0f7dd7ac9630 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> > > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ properties:
> > >            - qcom,pmk8350
> > >            - qcom,pmk8550
> > >            - qcom,pmm8155au
> > > +          - qcom,pmm8654au
> > >            - qcom,pmp8074
> > >            - qcom,pmr735a
> > >            - qcom,pmr735b
> >
> > I believe this is already applied, right?
> >
> > Not sure why I have 3 copies of seemingly the same patch in my inbox.
> >
>
> I've sent out three iterations of the series containing it. This one
> didn't change. As the rest of 18 patches don't concern your subsystem,
> I decided to only Cc you on this one. Let me know if you prefer to
> receive the entire series even if only a single patch needs your
> attention. The reaction to such dumps varies from maintainer to
> maintainer so I chose the safe approach. :)

There is no simple answer to that question.

Not Cc:ing me on this whole set appears to be the correct decision.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]