[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230331182931.GB6352@thinkpad>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:59:31 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] net: qrtr: Do not do DEL_SERVER broadcast after
DEL_CLIENT
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:02:04PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
> <..>
>
> > > -static int server_del(struct qrtr_node *node, unsigned int port)
> > > +static int server_del(struct qrtr_node *node, unsigned int port, bool bcast)
> > > {
> > > struct qrtr_lookup *lookup;
> > > struct qrtr_server *srv;
> > > @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int server_del(struct qrtr_node *node, unsigned int port)
> > > radix_tree_delete(&node->servers, port);
> > > /* Broadcast the removal of local servers */
> > > - if (srv->node == qrtr_ns.local_node)
> > > + if (srv->node == qrtr_ns.local_node && bcast)
> > > service_announce_del(&qrtr_ns.bcast_sq, srv);
> > > /* Announce the service's disappearance to observers */
> > > @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static int ctrl_cmd_bye(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from)
> > > }
> > > slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter);
> > > rcu_read_unlock();
> > > - server_del(node, srv->port);
> > > + server_del(node, srv->port, true);
> > > rcu_read_lock();
> > > }
> > > rcu_read_unlock();
> > > @@ -459,10 +459,13 @@ static int ctrl_cmd_del_client(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from,
> > > kfree(lookup);
> > > }
> > > - /* Remove the server belonging to this port */
> > > + /* Remove the server belonging to this port but don't broadcast
> >
> > This is still not as per the multi line comment style perferred in kernel.
> > Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#commenting
> >
>
> Ho, i had it like first style and checkpatch cribbed. Then changed it
> as per the second style for net/ format. You mean we should stick to
> 1 st style ?
>
Oops, sorry I forgot the fact that the networking code uses a different style.
Ignore my above comment.
- Mani
> Regards,
> Sricharan
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists