[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCaRKtj9eIs1HcpF@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:52:10 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current
tree
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:01:50PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 8e77d3d59d7b ("Revert "usb: xhci-pci: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS"")
>
> from the usb.current tree and commit:
>
> 130eac417085 ("xhci: use pm_ptr() instead of #ifdef for CONFIG_PM conditionals")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> index 6db07ca419c3,bbbb01282038..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> @@@ -771,11 -967,10 +967,9 @@@ static struct pci_driver xhci_pci_drive
> /* suspend and resume implemented later */
>
> .shutdown = usb_hcd_pci_shutdown,
> - #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> .driver = {
> - .pm = &usb_hcd_pci_pm_ops
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&usb_hcd_pci_pm_ops),
> - .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
> },
> - #endif
> };
>
> static int __init xhci_pci_init(void)
Thanks, this looks good. I'll resolve it this way when I send the
usb-linus branch to Linus this weekend.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists