[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230331080411.981038-4-davidgow@google.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:04:11 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Berg <benjamin@...solutions.net>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] kunit: kmalloc_array: Use kunit_add_action()
The kunit_add_action() function is much simpler and cleaner to use that
the full KUnit resource API for simple things like the
kunit_kmalloc_array() functionality.
Replacing it allows us to get rid of a number of helper functions, and
leaves us with no uses of kunit_alloc_resource(), which has some
usability problems and is going to have its behaviour modified in an
upcoming patch.
Note that we need to use kunit_defer_trigger_all() to implement
kunit_kfree().
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---
lib/kunit/test.c | 48 ++++++++----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index e2910b261112..ec45c8863f04 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -712,58 +712,26 @@ static struct notifier_block kunit_mod_nb = {
};
#endif
-struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params {
- size_t n;
- size_t size;
- gfp_t gfp;
-};
-
-static int kunit_kmalloc_array_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
+void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
{
- struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params *params = context;
-
- res->data = kmalloc_array(params->n, params->size, params->gfp);
- if (!res->data)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- return 0;
-}
+ void *data;
-static void kunit_kmalloc_array_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
-{
- kfree(res->data);
-}
+ data = kmalloc_array(n, size, gfp);
-void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
-{
- struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params params = {
- .size = size,
- .n = n,
- .gfp = gfp
- };
+ if (!data)
+ return NULL;
- return kunit_alloc_resource(test,
- kunit_kmalloc_array_init,
- kunit_kmalloc_array_free,
- gfp,
- ¶ms);
+ kunit_add_action(test, (kunit_defer_function_t)kfree, data, gfp);
+ return data;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kmalloc_array);
-static inline bool kunit_kfree_match(struct kunit *test,
- struct kunit_resource *res, void *match_data)
-{
- /* Only match resources allocated with kunit_kmalloc() and friends. */
- return res->free == kunit_kmalloc_array_free && res->data == match_data;
-}
-
void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
{
if (!ptr)
return;
- if (kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_kfree_match, (void *)ptr))
- KUNIT_FAIL(test, "kunit_kfree: %px already freed or not allocated by kunit", ptr);
+ kunit_release_action(test, (kunit_defer_function_t)kfree, (void *)ptr);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kfree);
--
2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists