linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51ccdfaee8deff0c172fafcec4bf427e8b54371e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2023 11:17:57 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the
 wireless tree

On Fri, 2023-03-31 at 10:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/mac80211/rx.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   a16fc38315f2 ("wifi: mac80211: fix potential null pointer dereference")
> 
> from the wireless tree and commit:
> 
>   fe4a6d2db3ba ("wifi: mac80211: implement support for yet another mesh A-MSDU format")
> 
> from the wireless-next tree.

Thanks for the heads-up. I sort of expected this, but didn't want to do
a merge or wireless into wireless-next before it was pulled, maybe I
should've staggered the pull requests, but you would've seen the merge
issue anyway.

Anyway, I've now pulled wireless into wireless-next, so you might
continue seeing this issue (*) if you merge net/net-next before merging
wireless-next, but it'll be completely resolved when we send the next
pull request to net-next (next week).

Thanks!

(*) and another one in nl80211 policy, I think?

joahnnes