[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed9f10e6-a2fe-1c75-a667-4dbdb91327c2@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 11:30:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>, swboyd@...omium.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
quic_plai@...cinc.com, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com,
quic_visr@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] clk: qcom: lpasscc-sc7280: Remove qdsp6ss clock
registration
On 27/03/2023 18:32, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> The qdsp6ss memory region is being shared by ADSP remoteproc device and
> lpasscc clock device, hence causing memory conflict.
> As the qdsp6ss clocks are being enabled in remoteproc driver, remove the
> qdsp6ss clock registration.
>
> Fixes: 4ab43d171181 ("clk: qcom: Add lpass clock controller driver for SC7280")
I don't understand why this is a fix. The clocks were working before,
right? So removing them is both ABI break and not a fix.
More over, this *cannot* be backported because it will break users, thus
Fixes tag is here misleading stable folks.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists