[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2370614d-6d9a-9f35-63a3-cfdcca2dd0c2@tessares.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:16:15 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] checkpatch: check for misuse of the link tags
Hi Thorsten,
On 31/03/2023 12:09, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>
> On 31.03.23 11:44, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Thorsten,
>>
>> On 31/03/2023 10:57, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> On 30.03.23 20:13, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>>> "Link:" and "Closes:" tags have to be used with public URLs.
>>>>
>>>> It is difficult to make sure the link is public but at least we can
>>>> verify the tag is followed by 'http(s):'.
>>>>
>>>> With that, we avoid such a tag that is not allowed [1]:
>>>>
>>>> Closes: <number>
>>>>
>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/CAHk-=wh0v1EeDV3v8TzK81nDC40=XuTdY2MCr0xy3m3FiBV3+Q@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
>>>> [...]
>>>> +# Check for misuse of the link tags
>>>> + if ($in_commit_log &&
>>>> + $line =~ /^\s*(\w+:)\s*(\S+)/) {
>>>> + my $tag = $1;
>>>> + my $value = $2;
>>>> + if ($tag =~ /^$link_tags_search$/ && $value !~ /^https?:/) {
>>>> + WARN("COMMIT_LOG_WRONG_LINK",
>>>> + "'$tag' should be followed by a public http(s) link\n" . $herecurr);
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> I must be missing something here, but it looks to me like this is
>>> checked twice now. See this line in patch2 (which is changed there, but
>>> the check itself remains):
>>>
>>>> } elsif ($rawlines[$linenr] !~ m{^link:\s*https?://}i) {
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, we had the following checks:
>>
>> - after Reported-by, there is a link tag (Link:|Closes:)
>>
>> - (link tags can take more than 75 chars)
>> - tags followed by "http(s)://" are restricted to link ones
>>
>> Then not: link tags (Link:|Closes:) are followed by "http(s):".
>
> Not in general, afaics -- and ensuring that is likely wise, so thx for
> this. But for Link: and Closes: tags after a Reported-by it is already
> checked, that's what I meant (and didn't communicate well, sorry). It's
> just a detail, but might be wise to do this in patch 4:
>
> - } elsif ($rawlines[$linenr] !~ m{^$link_tags_search\s*https?://}i) {
> + } elsif ($rawlines[$linenr] !~ m{^$link_tags_search}i) {
>
> (that's a line changed in patch2)
OK thank you. Sorry I didn't get that. Indeed, it should be enough to
just check for the tags, not for the "http(s)://" part.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists