[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28df13b6-201c-2fad-6f69-f12d24fba8e8@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:03:17 +0800
From: Jacky Huang <ychuang570808@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, schung@...oton.com, mjchen@...oton.com,
Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] dt-bindings: serial: Document ma35d1 uart
controller
On 2023/3/30 下午 09:12, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 06:52:11PM +0800, Jacky Huang wrote:
>>
>> On 2023/3/30 下午 03:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 29/03/2023 10:44, Jacky Huang wrote:
>>>> Dear Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your review.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2023/3/29 下午 04:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 28/03/2023 04:19, Jacky Huang wrote:
>>>>>> From: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add documentation to describe nuvoton ma35d1 uart driver bindings.
>>>>>>
>>>>> This depends on clock patches, so it must be taken together.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>> OK, I will combine this patch with the clock patch.
>>> I don't know what you mean by "combine", but I don't think this is what
>>> we want. You must clearly state all dependencies and patch merging
>>> strategy/way.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>> Dear Krzysztof,
>>
>>
>> I may be misunderstanding your request.
>> I thought it was moving the "nuvoton,ma35d1-serial.yaml" to the patch of
>> nuvoton,ma35d1-clk.h.
>> Would you please provide guidance what should I do next on this [PATCH v6
>> 07/12]. Thank you.
> The only combining you should do is putting the 2 patches in the same
> series. Combining to 1 patch would be wrong.
>
> Your other option is just drop the header in the example and use the
> raw numbers. Then there is no dependency to manage and each subsystem
> maintainer can take the relevant patches.
>
> Rob
Dear Rob,
Thanks for your detailed explanation. I got it now.
Best regards,
Jacky Huang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists