lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230401185717.1b971617@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sat, 1 Apr 2023 18:57:17 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: pressure: Honeywell mpr pressure sensor

On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 11:10:11 +0200
Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de> wrote:
Hi Andreas,

Various comments inline.

> Honeywell mpr is a familiy of pressure sensors.

Spell check.

> 
> Add initial I2C support.
> 
> Note:
> - Buffered mode is supported
> - SPI mode is not supported
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/pressure/Kconfig  |  12 ++
>  drivers/iio/pressure/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/iio/pressure/mpr.c    | 307 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 320 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/pressure/mpr.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/pressure/Kconfig
> index c9453389e4f7..e3ec94036e3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/Kconfig
> @@ -148,6 +148,18 @@ config MPL3115
>  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
>  	  will be called mpl3115.
>  
> +config MPR
> +	tristate "Honeywell MPR (MicroPressure sensors)"
> +	depends on I2C
> +	select IIO_BUFFER
> +	select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here to build support for the Honeywell MicroPressure pressure sensors MPR.
> +	  There are many different types with different pressure range. These ranges can be set up
> +	  in the device tree.
> +
> +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be called mpr.
> +
>  config MS5611
>  	tristate "Measurement Specialties MS5611 pressure sensor driver"
>  	select IIO_BUFFER
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/Makefile b/drivers/iio/pressure/Makefile
> index 083ae87ff48f..b701d9c7187d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/Makefile
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MPL115) += mpl115.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MPL115_I2C) += mpl115_i2c.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MPL115_SPI) += mpl115_spi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MPL3115) += mpl3115.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MPR) += mpr.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MS5611) += ms5611_core.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MS5611_I2C) += ms5611_i2c.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MS5611_SPI) += ms5611_spi.o
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/mpr.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/mpr.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1728b42bee7e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/mpr.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * MPR - MicroPressure pressure sensor driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
> + *
> + * Data sheet:
> + *  https://prod-edam.honeywell.com/content/dam/honeywell-edam/sps/siot/en-us/products/sensors/  \
> + *    pressure-sensors/board-mount-pressure-sensors/micropressure-mpr-series/documents/          \
> + *    sps-siot-mpr-series-datasheet-32332628-ciid-172626.pdf
> + *
> + * 7-bit I2C default slave address: 0x18
> + *
Trivial but this blank line doesn't add anything useful to my eye
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/of.h>
As below, should use stuff in linux/property.h not of.h

> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>

Not seeing any custom attributes (which is pretty much only reason you'd
need iio/sysfs.h)

> +#include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
> +
> +/* bits in i2c status byte */
> +#define MPR_I2C_POWER	BIT(6)	/* device is powered */
> +#define MPR_I2C_BUSY	BIT(5)	/* device is busy */
> +#define MPR_I2C_MEMORY	BIT(2)	/* integrity test passed */
> +#define MPR_I2C_MATH	BIT(0)	/* internal math saturation */
> +
> +struct mpr_data {
> +	struct device		*dev;

Given it's easy to get this dev from client->dev, don't bother holding
both in here.

> +	void			*client;
> +	struct mutex		lock;

All locks should have a comment saying what exactly they protect.

> +	s32			pmin;
> +	s32			pmax;
> +	struct gpio_desc	*gpiod_reset;
> +	int			irq;
> +	struct completion	completion;
> +	s64			channel[2] __aligned(8);

Why?  Good to call out the explicit purpose of this.  Usually easiest
option is to use a structure where you can call out the two elements
with names that tell reader what is going on.


> +};
> +
> +static int mpr_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val,
> +									int *val2, long mask);

Should be possible to reorder code so this isn't needed.

> +
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec mpr_channels[] = {
> +	{
> +		.type = IIO_PRESSURE,
> +		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> +		.scan_index = 0,
> +		.scan_type = {
> +			.sign = 's',
> +			.realbits = 64,
> +			.storagebits = 64,
> +			.endianness = IIO_CPU,
> +		},
> +	},
> +	IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(1),

> +};
> +
> +static const struct iio_info mpr_info = {
> +	.read_raw = &mpr_read_raw,
> +};
> +
> +static void mpr_reset(struct mpr_data *data)
> +{
> +	if (data->gpiod_reset) {
> +		gpiod_set_value(data->gpiod_reset, 0);
> +		udelay(10);
> +		gpiod_set_value(data->gpiod_reset, 1);
> +	}

If there isn't a reset signal, I'd like to see an attempt at least to write
all configuration registers to a known value (same as the one you'd
get after reset).  

> +}
> +
> +static int mpr_read_pressure(struct mpr_data *data, s64 *press)
> +{
> +	int ret, i;
> +	u8 wdata[] = {0xAA, 0x00, 0x00};
> +	s32 status;
> +	int nloops = 10;
> +	char buf[5];
> +	s64 press_cnt;
> +	s64 outputmin = 1677722;
> +	s64 outputmax = 15099494;
> +
> +	reinit_completion(&data->completion);
> +
> +	ret = i2c_master_send(data->client, wdata, sizeof(wdata));
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(data->dev, "error while writing ret: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (data->irq > 0) {
> +		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&data->completion, HZ);
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			dev_err(data->dev, "timeout while waiting for eoc interrupt\n");
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* wait until status indicates data is ready */
> +		for (i = 0; i < nloops; i++) {
> +			usleep_range(5000, 10000);

Add a comment on why this particular timing makes sense (reference to datasheet probably)

> +			status = i2c_smbus_read_byte(data->client);
> +			if (status < 0) {
> +				dev_err(data->dev, "error while reading, status: %d\n", status);
> +				return status;
> +			}
> +			if (!(status & MPR_I2C_BUSY))
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		if (i == nloops) {
> +			dev_err(data->dev, "timeout while reading\n");
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = i2c_master_recv(data->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(data->dev, "error in i2c_master_recv ret: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (buf[0] & MPR_I2C_BUSY) {
> +		/* it should never be the case that status still indicates business */
> +		dev_err(data->dev, "data still not ready: %08x\n", buf[0]);
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	}
> +
> +	press_cnt = buf[3] + buf[2] * 256 + buf[1] * 65536;

Looks like a get_unaligned_le24() open coded?  Use the standard function for
this as that makes it easier to see what is going on.

> +
> +	*press = ((press_cnt - outputmin) * (s64)(data->pmax - data->pmin))
> +					/ (outputmax - outputmin) + (s64)data->pmin;

Some defines for the value of outputmin and outputmax would be better than
using local variables that happen to be constant.

Looks to me like this could be broken into 
(raw + offset) * scale in which case you could use a _RAW interface with _OFFSET and
_SCALE allow you to make this into a 24 bit (well 32 bit) slot of a buffer should
you add buffered support later.


> +
> +	dev_dbg(data->dev, "received: %*ph cnt: %lld press: %lld\n", ret, buf, press_cnt, *press);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t mpr_eoc_handler(int irq, void *p)
> +{
> +	struct mpr_data *data = (struct mpr_data *)p;
> +
> +	complete(&data->completion);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t mpr_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> +	struct mpr_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> +	ret = mpr_read_pressure(data, &data->channel[0]);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data->channel, iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
> +	mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> +
> +err:
> +	iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int mpr_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val,
> +									int *val2, long mask)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	s64 pressure;
> +	struct mpr_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +	if (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) {

Given you only support one option neater to error out early if it's not a match even if you
have two do that twice.

	if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)
		return -EINVAL;


> +		mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> +		ret = mpr_read_pressure(data, &pressure);
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		if (chan->type == IIO_PRESSURE) {

Check that earlier. Not a lot of point in reading the data if channel type
is wrong.

> +			*val = (s32)clamp(pressure, 0LL, 2147483648LL);

What is special about that constant?  If it's a device specific value then
given it a name.

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int mpr_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct mpr_data *data;
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;

As below, switch to non of specific firmware handlign.

> +
> +	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BYTE))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*data));
> +	if (!indio_dev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	data->dev = &client->dev;
> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);

I can't see where this is used.

> +	data->client = client;
> +	data->irq = client->irq;
> +
> +	mutex_init(&data->lock);
> +	init_completion(&data->completion);
> +
> +	indio_dev->name = client->name;

Should be part number.  As a string provided here (or more likely in a
device type specific structure that you are going to add).

> +	indio_dev->info = &mpr_info;
> +	indio_dev->channels = mpr_channels;
> +	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(mpr_channels);
> +	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> +
> +	if (np) {

Don't use of specific interfaces.  Use the ones from linux/property.h instead.
Lets other firmware types work 'for free' so we are trying to avoid introducing
any of specific handling into new IIO drivers (and slowly scrubbing the old ones
for this)ยท

if (dev_fwnode()) etc


> +		if (of_property_read_s32(np, "honeywell,pmin", &data->pmin)) {

all these need to converting to the device_property_xxx equivalents.

> +			dev_err(dev, "honeywell,pmin missing in DT\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +		if (of_property_read_s32(np, "honeywell,pmax", &data->pmax)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "honeywell,pmax missing in DT\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		data->gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);

Whilst these are sort of fw node dependent they don't need the protection.
So drop them out of this if (np) block.

devm_gpiod_get_optional() given you support not having it.


> +		if (IS_ERR(data->gpiod_reset)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset-gpios: err=%pe\n",
> +								data->gpiod_reset);

Not an error so dev_dbg() probably right thing to report.

> +			data->gpiod_reset = NULL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (data->irq > 0) {
> +			ret = devm_request_irq(dev, data->irq, mpr_eoc_handler,
> +							IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, client->name, data);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				dev_err(dev, "request irq %d failed\n", data->irq);
> +				return ret;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* when loaded as i2c device we need to use default values */
> +		dev_warn(dev, "no dt node found; using defaults\n");

A strong argument in favour of not handling all devices via one 'compatible'
(or the the i2c_device_id version of that anyway).

> +		data->pmin = 0;
> +		data->pmax = 172369; /* 25 psi */

Perhaps worth defining the maths for that conversion so that you can just use

	psi_to_milibar(25); or whatever makes sense.

> +		data->gpiod_reset = NULL;

Should be no need to set that as it will be NULL anyway in this path.

> +	}
> +
> +	mpr_reset(data);
> +
> +	ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev, NULL, mpr_trigger_handler, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "iio triggered buffer setup failed\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to register iio device\n");

In general use
		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, ...)
for all errors that only occur on probe.  That wraps up some stuff around
deferred probing but is in general a good thing to do even if a given
call can't defer.

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mpr_matches[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "honeywell,mpr", .data = 0 },

No point in filling data either here or in the i2c_device_id
entries until something useful is done with it.
When you do (which is likely after request to use compatibles
to indicate a lot of the per device type variability) then you should look
for having the data as a pointer to a const structure that describes what those
per device type details.

> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mpr_matches);
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id mpr_id[] = {
> +	{ "honeywell,mpr", 0 },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mpr_id);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver mpr_driver = {
> +	.probe = mpr_probe,
> +	.id_table = mpr_id,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "mpr",
> +		.of_match_table = mpr_matches,
> +	},
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(mpr_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MPR I2C driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(IIO_MPR);

Why?  You aren't exporting any symbols in that namespace that I can see.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ