[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9ace69a8085e22fafd9159e99edd7bbfae2f9940.1680371809.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 19:59:50 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 5/5] spi: fsl-spi: No need to check transfer length versus word size
The verification is already do in the SPI core by function
__spi_validate(), not it to check it again in fsl_spi_bufs().
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
index d011beddee29..9938b058c9e2 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
@@ -263,18 +263,10 @@ static int fsl_spi_bufs(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *t,
if (t->bits_per_word)
bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word;
- if (bits_per_word > 8) {
- /* invalid length? */
- if (len & 1)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (bits_per_word > 8)
len /= 2;
- }
- if (bits_per_word > 16) {
- /* invalid length? */
- if (len & 1)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (bits_per_word > 16)
len /= 2;
- }
mpc8xxx_spi->tx = t->tx_buf;
mpc8xxx_spi->rx = t->rx_buf;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists