[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88FD5EFE-6946-42C4-881B-329C3FE01D26@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 18:24:11 +0000
From: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"zbr@...emap.net" <zbr@...emap.net>,
"brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"ecree.xilinx@...il.com" <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"socketcan@...tkopp.net" <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
"petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering
> On Mar 31, 2023, at 9:09 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:55:23 -0700 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>> +int netlink_broadcast_filtered(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + __u32 portid, __u32 group, gfp_t allocation,
>> + int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk,
>> + struct sk_buff *skb, void *data),
>> + void *filter_data);
>
>> -int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
>> - u32 group, gfp_t allocation)
>> +int netlink_broadcast_filtered(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + u32 portid,
>> + u32 group, gfp_t allocation,
>> + int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk,
>> + struct sk_buff *skb, void *data),
>> + void *filter_data)
>
> nit: slight divergence between __u32 and u32 types, something to clean
> up if you post v5
Thanks so much! Will do. Any comments on the connector patches?
Anjali
Powered by blists - more mailing lists