[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2fec0a5855150966fa5a920216c205032965f98@lausen.nl>
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 20:53:48 +0000
From: "Leonard Lausen" <leonard@...sen.nl>
To: "Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@...hat.com>,
"Dikshita Agarwal" <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
"Vikash Garodia" <vgarodia@....qualcomm.com>,
"Linux regressions mailing list" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
"Stanimir Varbanov" <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mka@...omium.org,
"Albert Esteve" <aesteve@...hat.com>, stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra" <eballetb@...hat.com>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Vikash Garodia (QUIC)" <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
"Fritz Koenig" <frkoenig@...gle.com>,
"Rajeshwar Kurapaty (QUIC)" <quic_rkurapat@...cinc.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "venus: firmware: Correct non-pix start and end
addresses"
Hi Javier, Dikshita, Stan,
the revert wasn't applied to v6.2 series. Can you please apply it and include it for v6.2.10?
March 6, 2023 at 5:43 AM, "Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On 3/1/2023 3:15 PM, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
>>> On 2/28/2023 9:33 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>> Javier Martinez Canillas<javierm@...hat.com> writes:
>>>>> Vikash Garodia<vgarodia@....qualcomm.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stan, could you please help with the revert and a pull request having this revert
>>>>>> alongwith other pending changes ?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Other fix posted is "media: venus: dec: Fix capture formats enumeration order":
>>>>>
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20230210081835.2054482-1-javierm@redhat.com/
>>
>> Hi Javier,
>>
>> Thanks for this patch "media: venus: dec: Fix capture formats
>> enumeration order".
>>
>> Somehow I can't find it in my mailbox to be able to reply there.
>>
>> Could you please explain what is the regression you see here?
>>
>
>You can find the thread and explanation of the issue here:
>
>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y+KPW18o%2FDa+N8UI@google.com/T/
>
>But Stanimir already picked it and sent a PR for v6.3 including it.
While "media: venus: dec: Fix capture formats enumeration order" may have been
applied to v6.3, this still leaves the regression introduced by "venus:
firmware: Correct non-pix start and end addresses". As pointed out by Matthias
Kaehlcke, the commit prevents SC7180 and sc7280 AOSS from entering sleep mode
during system suspend. This is a serious regression in v6.2 kernel series.
Best regards,
Leonard Lausen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists