lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230402174657.55159879@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sun, 2 Apr 2023 17:46:57 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: addac: stx104: Migrate to the regmap API


> > > +	.wr_table = &aio_ctl_wr_table,
> > > +	.rd_table = &aio_ctl_rd_table,
> > > +	.volatile_table = &aio_ctl_volatile_table,
> > > +	.cache_type = REGCACHE_FLAT,
> > > +};  
> > 
> > Do we need regmap lock?  
> 
> I think the regmap lock is opt-out, so I don't think we need to set an
> custom lock callback for the regmaps in this driver.
> 
> Jonathan, do read_raw() and write_raw() require explicit locking?

The don't provide their own locking.  Depending on the access pattern the
underlying bus locking may be sufficient.  If you have read modify write
cycles though you'll want locking at the appropriate level for that
which might well be at the level of regmap.

Jonathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ