[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCnff6gUjU89zfAb@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 22:03:11 +0200
From: Valentin Vidić <vvidic@...entin-vidic.from.hr>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Micah Morton <mortonm@...omium.org>,
Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security, lsm: security_old_inode_init_security() Handle
multi LSM registration
On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> If you have the time, could you try a patch we have queued up in the
> lsm/next branch? We are in the process of removing
> security_old_inode_init_security() and transitioning all the callers
> over to security_inode_init_security(), and I believe the ocfs2 patch
> for this should solve the problem you are seeing, can you test it on
> your system and let us know?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm.git/patch/?id=de3004c874e740304cc4f4a83d6200acb511bbda
Great, thanks for the pointer. This patch also works for me as I don't
see the crash anymore. Can it also be included in the 6.1 LTS kernel
since this is were I first noticed the problem?
--
Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists