[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB4723A8D079076FA56AB45845D48C9@AM0PR04MB4723.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 08:17:49 +0000
From: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com>
To: Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@...nix.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC: "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"pasic@...ux.ibm.com" <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
"farman@...ux.ibm.com" <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yan@...nix.com" <yan@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support
Hi Viktor,
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 4c3bb0ddeb9b..f9c6604352b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -2752,6 +2752,23 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_del_virtqueue);
>
> +u32 vring_notification_data(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> +{
> + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> + u16 next;
> +
> + if (vq->packed_ring)
> + next = (vq->packed.next_avail_idx &
> + ~(-(1 << VRING_PACKED_EVENT_F_WRAP_CTR))) |
> + vq->packed.avail_wrap_counter <<
> + VRING_PACKED_EVENT_F_WRAP_CTR;
> + else
> + next = vq->split.avail_idx_shadow;
> +
> + return next << 16 | _vq->index;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_notification_data);
> +
> /* Manipulates transport-specific feature bits. */
> void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> @@ -2771,6 +2788,8 @@ void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> break;
> case VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM:
> break;
> + case VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA:
> + break;
This function is used by virtio_vdpa as well (drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c:virtio_vdpa_finalize_features).
A vDPA device can offer this feature and it will be accepted, even though VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA is not a thing for the vDPA transport at the moment.
I don't know if this is bad, since offering VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA is meaningless for a vDPA device at the moment.
I submitted a patch adding support for vDPA transport.
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20230402081034.1021886-1-alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com/T/#u
> default:
> /* We don't understand this bit. */
> __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, i);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists