[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230403174406.4180472-5-ltykernel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 13:43:52 -0400
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
jgross@...e.com, tiala@...rosoft.com, kirill@...temov.name,
jiangshan.ljs@...group.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ashish.kalra@....com, srutherford@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@....com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, ray.huang@....com, brijesh.singh@....com,
michael.roth@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
venu.busireddy@...cle.com, sterritt@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, samitolvanen@...gle.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com
Cc: pangupta@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V4 04/17] x86/hyperv: Use vmmcall to implement Hyper-V hypercall in sev-snp enlightened guest
From: Tianyu Lan <tiala@...rosoft.com>
In sev-snp enlightened guest, Hyper-V hypercall needs
to use vmmcall to trigger vmexit and notify hypervisor
to handle hypercall request.
Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <tiala@...rosoft.com>
---
Change since RFC V2:
* Fix indentation style
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
index 2fa40c6ca99f..3c15e23162e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
@@ -52,16 +52,25 @@ static inline u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output)
u64 hv_status;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- if (!hv_hypercall_pg)
- return U64_MAX;
+ if (hv_isolation_type_en_snp()) {
+ __asm__ __volatile__("mov %4, %%r8\n"
+ "vmmcall"
+ : "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
+ "+c" (control), "+d" (input_address)
+ : "r" (output_address)
+ : "cc", "memory", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
+ } else {
+ if (!hv_hypercall_pg)
+ return U64_MAX;
- __asm__ __volatile__("mov %4, %%r8\n"
- CALL_NOSPEC
- : "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
- "+c" (control), "+d" (input_address)
- : "r" (output_address),
- THUNK_TARGET(hv_hypercall_pg)
- : "cc", "memory", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
+ __asm__ __volatile__("mov %4, %%r8\n"
+ CALL_NOSPEC
+ : "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
+ "+c" (control), "+d" (input_address)
+ : "r" (output_address),
+ THUNK_TARGET(hv_hypercall_pg)
+ : "cc", "memory", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
+ }
#else
u32 input_address_hi = upper_32_bits(input_address);
u32 input_address_lo = lower_32_bits(input_address);
@@ -95,7 +104,13 @@ static inline u64 _hv_do_fast_hypercall8(u64 control, u64 input1)
u64 hv_status;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- {
+ if (hv_isolation_type_en_snp()) {
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "vmmcall"
+ : "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
+ "+c" (control), "+d" (input1)
+ :: "cc", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
+ } else {
__asm__ __volatile__(CALL_NOSPEC
: "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
"+c" (control), "+d" (input1)
@@ -140,7 +155,14 @@ static inline u64 _hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u64 control, u64 input1, u64 input2)
u64 hv_status;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- {
+ if (hv_isolation_type_en_snp()) {
+ __asm__ __volatile__("mov %4, %%r8\n"
+ "vmmcall"
+ : "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
+ "+c" (control), "+d" (input1)
+ : "r" (input2)
+ : "cc", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
+ } else {
__asm__ __volatile__("mov %4, %%r8\n"
CALL_NOSPEC
: "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists