[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230403-peroxide-retail-d7046cb806fe@spud>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 19:31:38 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] riscv: mm: dma-noncoherent: Switch using function
pointers for cache management
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 07:23:37PM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > I think all of the above should be prefixed with riscv_cbom to match the
> > other riscv_cbom stuff we already have.
> Just to clarify, the riscv_cbom prefix should just be applied to the
> ZICOM functions and not to T-HEAD?
Yah, can leave the T-HEAD stuff as is IMO.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists