linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] kunit: add tests for using current KUnit test field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  3 Apr 2023 20:19:30 +0000
From:   Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com, dlatypov@...gle.com
Cc:     skhan@...uxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] kunit: add tests for using current KUnit test field

Create test suite called "kunit_current" to add test coverage for the use
of current->kunit_test, which returns the current KUnit test.

Add two test cases:
- kunit_current_test to test current->kunit_test and the method
  kunit_get_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test.

- kunit_current_fail_test to test the method
  kunit_fail_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test.

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
---

Changes from v1->v2:
- Combine two test cases to test both ways of getting current test in
  kunit_current_test.
- Changes to comments.
- Add kunit_cleanup to kunit_current_fail_test.

 lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
index b63595d3e241..42e44caa1bdd 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
  */
 #include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
 
 #include "try-catch-impl.h"
 
@@ -532,7 +533,46 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_status_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = kunit_status_test_cases,
 };
 
+static void kunit_current_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* Check results of both current->kunit_test and
+	 * kunit_get_current_test() are equivalent to current test.
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, test, current->kunit_test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, test, kunit_get_current_test());
+}
+
+static void kunit_current_fail_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit fake;
+
+	kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS);
+
+	/* Set current->kunit_test to fake test. */
+	current->kunit_test = &fake;
+
+	kunit_fail_current_test("This should make `fake` test fail.");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_FAILURE);
+	kunit_cleanup(&fake);
+
+	/* Reset current->kunit_test to current test. */
+	current->kunit_test = test;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case kunit_current_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_current_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_current_fail_test),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kunit_current_test_suite = {
+	.name = "kunit_current",
+	.test_cases = kunit_current_test_cases,
+};
+
 kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite,
-		  &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite);
+		  &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite,
+		  &kunit_current_test_suite);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

base-commit: 7232282dd47cce6a780c9414bd9baccf232c7686
-- 
2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog