[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230403051824.GD4627@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 10:48:24 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
Cc: mhi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: host: Use ERANGE for BHIOFF/BHIEOFF range check
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:21:00AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> If the BHIOFF or BHIEOFF range checks fail, they return EINVAL. ERANGE
> is a better error code since it implies an out of range condition.
>
> Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
Applied to mhi-next!
- Mani
> ---
>
> This feels more like a style change than fixing a bug, so I'm being
> conservative and intentionally not listing a fixes tag.
>
> drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c
> index b46a082..f72fcb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c
> @@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ int mhi_prepare_for_power_up(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> if (bhi_off >= mhi_cntrl->reg_len) {
> dev_err(dev, "BHI offset: 0x%x is out of range: 0x%zx\n",
> bhi_off, mhi_cntrl->reg_len);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + ret = -ERANGE;
> goto error_reg_offset;
> }
> mhi_cntrl->bhi = mhi_cntrl->regs + bhi_off;
> @@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ int mhi_prepare_for_power_up(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> dev_err(dev,
> "BHIe offset: 0x%x is out of range: 0x%zx\n",
> bhie_off, mhi_cntrl->reg_len);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + ret = -ERANGE;
> goto error_reg_offset;
> }
> mhi_cntrl->bhie = mhi_cntrl->regs + bhie_off;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists