[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCtB8Vu4Brm3G639@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 23:15:29 +0200
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: sn65dsi83: Add DSI
video mode
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 04:06:22PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:17:51PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> >
> > SN65DSI8[34] device supports burst video mode and non-burst video mode
> > with sync events or with sync pulses packet transmission as described in
> > the DSI specification.
> >
> > Add property to select the expected mode, this allows for example to
> > select a mode that is compatible with the DSI host interface.
>
> Why does this need to be in DT?
> The source and sink drivers should know what their capabilities are
> and pick the best common one.
Is there a best mode? Isn't this a decision how do we want the 2 peers
to communicate?
For the MIPI-DSI Linux/DRM experts: am I missing something? Is there
another way to have a DSI video sink to ask for a specific mode?
(I copied this from an existing DSI panel binding).
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists