[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e887a8c9-4310-a6cb-62d2-39db7d75d452@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 08:50:59 +1000 (AEST)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Brad Boyer <flar@...andria.com>
cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] nubus: Don't list slot resources by default
On Sun, 2 Apr 2023, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:37:02PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/nubus/nubus.c b/drivers/nubus/nubus.c
> > index f70ba58dbc55..d2d2b580f646 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nubus/nubus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nubus/nubus.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@
> >
> > /* Globals */
> >
> > +/* This parameter makes slot resources available in procfs. It's deprecated and
> > + * disabled by default as procfs is no longer thought to be suitable for that.
> > + */
> > +bool populate_procfs;
> > +module_param(populate_procfs, bool, 0);
> > +
> > LIST_HEAD(nubus_func_rsrcs);
> >
> > /* Meaning of "bytelanes":
>
> Would it be better to give this option a name that indicates that it is
> for nubus only? These are effectively a global namespace. Other than
> this, I don't see any issues.
>
The name of the module here is "nubus", so this parameter is specified as
"nubus.populate_procfs" in the kernel parameters. Without the "nubus" it
doesn't work. I should probably add a comment about that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists