[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230403090858.GT4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 11:08:58 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Optimize perf_pmu_migrate_context()
Thomas reported that offlining CPUs spends a lot of time in
synchronize_rcu() as called from perf_pmu_migrate_context() even though
he's not actually using uncore events.
Turns out, the thing is unconditionally waiting for RCU, even if there's
no actual events to migrate.
Fixes: 0cda4c023132 ("perf: Introduce perf_pmu_migrate_context()")
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index fb3e436bcd4a..115320faf1db 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -12893,12 +12893,14 @@ void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu *pmu, int src_cpu, int dst_cpu)
__perf_pmu_remove(src_ctx, src_cpu, pmu, &src_ctx->pinned_groups, &events);
__perf_pmu_remove(src_ctx, src_cpu, pmu, &src_ctx->flexible_groups, &events);
- /*
- * Wait for the events to quiesce before re-instating them.
- */
- synchronize_rcu();
+ if (!list_empty(&events)) {
+ /*
+ * Wait for the events to quiesce before re-instating them.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
- __perf_pmu_install(dst_ctx, dst_cpu, pmu, &events);
+ __perf_pmu_install(dst_ctx, dst_cpu, pmu, &events);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&dst_ctx->mutex);
mutex_unlock(&src_ctx->mutex);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists