lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2023 11:41:44 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

Il 03/04/23 10:45, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> Il 03/04/23 10:15, Stephen Rothwell ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the mediatek tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
>> defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.o: in function 
>> `mtk_mmsys_update_bits':
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:147: undefined reference to `cmdq_pkt_write_mask'
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.o: in function 
>> `mtk_mmsys_probe':
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:386: undefined reference to 
>> `cmdq_dev_get_client_reg'
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.o: in function 
>> `mtk_mutex_enable_by_cmdq':
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c:883: undefined reference to `cmdq_pkt_write'
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.o: in function 
>> `mtk_mutex_probe':
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c:1023: undefined reference to 
>> `cmdq_dev_get_client_reg'
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>>    b34884b4c878 ("soc: mediatek: Cleanup ifdefs for IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)")
>>
> 
> I can recheck why this happens - otherwise we can simply avoid applying that commit
> if there's no time.
> 

Followup: I've rechecked and sent a solution for that; please check [1].

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403093304.276418-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/


>> I have used the mediatek tree from next-20230331 for today.
>>
>> There were also the following warnings:
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:104.21-109.4: Warning 
>> (unit_address_format): /soc/i2c@...10000/accelerometer@...0: unit name should not 
>> have leading "0x"
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:111.20-114.4: Warning 
>> (unit_address_format): /soc/i2c@...10000/magnetometer@...2: unit name should not 
>> have leading "0x"
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:104.21-109.4: Warning 
>> (i2c_bus_reg): /soc/i2c@...10000/accelerometer@...0: I2C bus unit address format 
>> error, expected "10"
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6795-sony-xperia-m5.dts:111.20-114.4: Warning 
>> (i2c_bus_reg): /soc/i2c@...10000/magnetometer@...2: I2C bus unit address format 
>> error, expected "12"
>>
> 
> Matthias, should I send new versions of the commits, addressing this sad overlook
> from my side, or would you fix that, or should I send new commits cleaning that up
> on top?
> 
> Please let me know how to proceed here.
> 
> Thanks,
> Angelo
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ