linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1 0/2] Improve RK3588 clocks and power domains support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22215580.EfDdHjke4D@diego>
Date:   Mon, 03 Apr 2023 12:22:39 +0200
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
        Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
        Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@...eble.ai>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/2] Improve RK3588 clocks and power domains support

Hi,

Am Samstag, 1. April 2023, 16:30:53 CEST schrieb Vincent Legoll:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm running a QuartzPro64 with this patch set applied, everything(*)
> works properly.
> 
> (*) eMMC, SD, LED, ethernet, serial, watchdog.
> 
> Are there any tests I can do to help with this ?

gmac1 and sdmmc do reference power-domains in the dts, so things should
be fine and I guess if your system boots successfully this might be enough.

If you want to check more, try
# mkdir /debug
# mount none /debug -t debugfs
[or do this to a location of your choice, I guess the standard is under /proc]

# cat /debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary

and check the runtime_status field.


Also you could provide a email-reply with a

Tested-by: Your Name <your-email>

line in it :-)


Heiko