[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrap_T3B6k=kUqfXCyJaW87sdEfsymmNm_pYRFLeX3n+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 14:35:31 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_sayalil@...cinc.com,
quic_luliang@...cinc.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, yebin10@...wei.com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, liqiong@...china.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: core: remove unnecessary (void*) conversions
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 at 14:13, Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 05:11, Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com> wrote:
> >> Pointer variables of void * type do not require type cast.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > Did Marek give his reviewed-by tag offlist? I couldn't find his reply,
> > just to make sure this is correct?
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Uffe
>
>
> Sorry, it may be a misuse of "reviewed-by" tag, "Marek Szyprowski" gave the error
> report at the previous patch, so, i put the name at reviewed-by tag.
Yes, you shouldn't put his tag like this, unless he explicitly has said so.
For bug reports we use "Reported-by:", but in this case I decided it
was better to drop the offending commit, which means this isn't
applicable here.
Anyway, there is no need to resend, I will just drop the tag when applying.
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 6 +++---
> >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c b/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c
> >> index fe6808771bc7..2c97b94aab23 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c
> >> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(mmc_err_state, mmc_err_state_get, NULL, "%llu\n");
> >>
> >> static int mmc_err_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
> >> {
> >> - struct mmc_host *host = (struct mmc_host *)file->private;
> >> + struct mmc_host *host = file->private;
> >> const char *desc[MMC_ERR_MAX] = {
> >> [MMC_ERR_CMD_TIMEOUT] = "Command Timeout Occurred",
> >> [MMC_ERR_CMD_CRC] = "Command CRC Errors Occurred",
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> >> index 156d34b2ed4d..0f6a563103fd 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> >> @@ -3045,7 +3045,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(mmc_test_file_test);
> >>
> >> static int mtf_test_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
> >> {
> >> - struct mmc_card *card = (struct mmc_card *)sf->private;
> >> + struct mmc_card *card = sf->private;
> >> struct mmc_test_general_result *gr;
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&mmc_test_lock);
> >> @@ -3079,8 +3079,8 @@ static int mtf_test_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >> static ssize_t mtf_test_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> >> size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> >> {
> >> - struct seq_file *sf = (struct seq_file *)file->private_data;
> >> - struct mmc_card *card = (struct mmc_card *)sf->private;
> >> + struct seq_file *sf = file->private_data;
> >> + struct mmc_card *card = sf->private;
> >> struct mmc_test_card *test;
> >> long testcase;
> >> int ret;
> >> --
> >> 2.11.0
> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists