linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] Add EMAC3 support for sa8540p-ride

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2023 08:01:12 -0500
From:   Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org, wens@...e.org,
        jernej.skrabec@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, veekhee@...le.com,
        tee.min.tan@...ux.intel.com, mohammad.athari.ismail@...el.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, ruppala@...dia.com, bmasney@...hat.com,
        andrey.konovalov@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ncai@...cinc.com,
        jsuraj@....qualcomm.com, hisunil@...cinc.com, echanude@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] Add EMAC3 support for sa8540p-ride

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 09:55:04PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 17:06:13 -0500 Andrew Halaney wrote:
> > As promised: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230331215804.783439-1-ahalaney@redhat.com/T/#t
> 
> Patch 12 never made it to netdev or lore :(
> 

Well, that's no good as I definitely want some eyes on that one :(

I've already gotten _some_ reviews on the earlier patches in v3,
I am going to absorb anything super quick into a v4 today, then send that out,
maybe copy pasting larger questions I have yet to respond to? Seems like
an ok approach.. not having the full solution in hand is crummy for
review. Let me know if you think that's a bad call and just a resend is
better.

Sorry, not sure where I messed that up Friday evening when writing
changelogs etc.