linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] regmap: Add basic maple tree register cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168052755618.39566.9880941918652790444.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:12:36 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] regmap: Add basic maple tree register cache

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:10:22 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The current state of the art for sparse register maps is the
> rbtree cache.  This works well for most applications but isn't
> always ideal for sparser register maps since the rbtree can get
> deep, requiring a lot of walking.  Fortunately the kernel has a
> data structure intended to address this very problem, the maple
> tree.  Provide an initial implementation of a register cache
> based on the maple tree to start taking advantage of it.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] regmap: Factor out single value register syncing
      commit: 05933e2d44607767ecb4937a33df4e882bdf9ad3
[2/2] regmap: Add maple tree based register cache
      commit: f033c26de5a5734625d2dd1dc196745fae186f1b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark