linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irq: fasteoi handler re-runs on concurrent invoke

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a2a5a6274dce7a68c657f6a9c2b0c22e23d91950.camel@amazon.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2023 13:39:24 +0000
From:   "Gowans, James" <jgowans@...zon.com>
To:     "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
        "chris.zjh@...wei.com" <chris.zjh@...wei.com>
CC:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "zouyipeng@...wei.com" <zouyipeng@...wei.com>,
        "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@...zon.com>,
        "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: fasteoi handler re-runs on concurrent invoke

On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 14:19 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Neither solutions are remotely acceptable.
> I'll look at something a bit more palatable.

Thanks Marc, that will be much appreciated.

Out of interest though, why is the suggestion to mark the irq_desc as pending
and re-run the handler not acceptable?

JG