linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm/iommu/sva: Fix error code for LAM enabling failure due to SVA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+b=+DOuL2tR_q2F608xXms-MwWLBsz_+PtVojvQj98rcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2023 15:55:43 +0200
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Taras Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm/iommu/sva: Fix error code for LAM enabling
 failure due to SVA

On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 at 13:10, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Normally, LAM and SVA are mutually exclusive. LAM enabling will fail if
> SVA is already in use.
>
> Correct error code for the failure. EINTR is nonsensical there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 23e5d9ec2bab ("x86/mm/iommu/sva: Make LAM and SVA mutually exclusive")
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> index 74c7e84a94d8..c7dfd727c9ec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static int prctl_enable_tagged_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_bits)
>
>         if (mm_valid_pasid(mm) &&
>             !test_bit(MM_CONTEXT_FORCE_TAGGED_SVA, &mm->context.flags))
> -               return -EINTR;
> +               return -EINVAL;
>
>         if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
>                 return -EINTR;
> --
> 2.39.2
>