[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496784d9-0e17-1be5-f33b-3fefa5c4ede4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 23:17:40 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bumwoo Lee <bw365.lee@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/14] extcon: use dev_of_node(dev) instead of
dev->of_node
On 23. 3. 22. 23:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The dev_of_node function should be preferred.
> In the result we may drop unneeded NULL check
> of the pointer to the device object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index 5cadbfc151e6..32e96cb49067 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -1429,21 +1429,17 @@ struct extcon_dev *extcon_find_edev_by_node(struct device_node *node)
> */
> struct extcon_dev *extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(struct device *dev, int index)
> {
> - struct device_node *node;
> + struct device_node *node, *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> struct extcon_dev *edev;
>
> - if (!dev)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -
> - if (!dev->of_node) {
> + if (!np) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "device does not have a device node entry\n");
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "extcon", index);
> + node = of_parse_phandle(np, "extcon", index);
> if (!node) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n",
> - dev->of_node);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n", np);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> }
>
Applied it with the following patch title.
Just use capital letter at the beginning char of title
- extcon: Use dev_of_node(dev) instead of dev->of_node
--
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists