[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEivzxcdGBJeiLX1qRnNpiDxxCwwVCSax3ADzDfNTXwyWO0sYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 16:56:10 +0200
From: Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
Cc: mszeredi@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>,
Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
criu@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] fuse: add fuse device ioctl(FUSE_DEV_IOC_REINIT)
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 8:19 PM Bernd Schubert
<bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/23 20:37, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > This ioctl aborts fuse connection and then reinitializes it,
> > sends FUSE_INIT request to allow a new userspace daemon
> > to pick up the fuse connection.
> >
> > Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> > Cc: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>
> > Cc: Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
> > Cc: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: criu@...nvz.org
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > fs/fuse/dev.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/fuse.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > index 737764c2295e..0f53ffd63957 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > @@ -2187,6 +2187,112 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_abort_conn);
> >
> > +static int fuse_reinit_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> > +{
> > + struct fuse_iqueue *fiq = &fc->iq;
> > + struct fuse_dev *fud;
> > + unsigned int i;
>
> Assuming you have a malicious daemon that tries to cause bad behavior,
> only allow one ioctl at at time? I.e. add a value that reinit is in
> progress? And unset at the end of the function?
Have done. Thanks!
>
> > +
> > + if (fc->conn_gen + 1 < fc->conn_gen)
> > + return -EOVERFLOW;
> > +
>
> Add a comment, like
>
> /* Unsets fc->connected and fiq->connected and ensures that no new
> requests can be queued */
>
> ?
Have done.
>
> > + fuse_abort_conn(fc);
> > + fuse_wait_aborted(fc);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&fc->lock);
> > + if (fc->connected) {
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (fc->conn_gen + 1 < fc->conn_gen) {
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > + return -EOVERFLOW;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fc->conn_gen++;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&fiq->lock);
> > + if (request_pending(fiq) || fiq->forget_list_tail != &fiq->forget_list_head) {
> > + spin_unlock(&fiq->lock);
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (&fuse_dev_fiq_ops != fiq->ops) {
> > + spin_unlock(&fiq->lock);
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fiq->connected = 1;
> > + spin_unlock(&fiq->lock);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&fc->bg_lock);
> > + if (!list_empty(&fc->bg_queue)) {
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->bg_lock);
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fc->blocked = 0;
> > + fc->max_background = FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_BACKGROUND;
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->bg_lock);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(fud, &fc->devices, entry) {
> > + struct fuse_pqueue *fpq = &fud->pq;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&fpq->lock);
> > + if (!list_empty(&fpq->io)) {
> > + spin_unlock(&fpq->lock);
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < FUSE_PQ_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> > + if (!list_empty(&fpq->processing[i])) {
> > + spin_unlock(&fpq->lock);
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + fpq->connected = 1;
> > + spin_unlock(&fpq->lock);
> > + }
> > +
> > + fuse_set_initialized(fc);
>
> I'm not sure about this, why not the common way via FUSE_INIT reply?
fuse_send_init will fail, if !fc->initialized (see fuse_block_alloc <-
fuse_get_req <- fuse_simple_background).
>
> > +
> > + /* Background queuing checks fc->connected under bg_lock */
> > + spin_lock(&fc->bg_lock);
> > + fc->connected = 1;
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->bg_lock);
> > +
> > + fc->aborted = false;
> > + fc->abort_err = 0;
> > +
> > + /* nullify all the flags */
> > + memset(&fc->flags, 0, sizeof(struct fuse_conn_flags));
> > +
> > + spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> > +
> > + down_read(&fc->killsb);
> > + if (!list_empty(&fc->mounts)) {
> > + struct fuse_mount *fm;
> > +
> > + fm = list_first_entry(&fc->mounts, struct fuse_mount, fc_entry);
> > + if (!fm->sb) {
> > + up_read(&fc->killsb);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fuse_send_init(fm);
> > + }
> > + up_read(&fc->killsb);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > void fuse_wait_aborted(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> > {
> > /* matches implicit memory barrier in fuse_drop_waiting() */
> > @@ -2282,6 +2388,32 @@ static long fuse_dev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > }
> > }
> > break;
> > + case FUSE_DEV_IOC_REINIT:
> > + struct fuse_conn *fc;
> > +
> > + if (!checkpoint_restore_ns_capable(file->f_cred->user_ns))
> > + return -EPERM;
> > +
> > + res = -EINVAL;
> > + fud = fuse_get_dev(file);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Only fuse mounts with an already initialized fuse
> > + * connection are supported
> > + */
> > + if (file->f_op == &fuse_dev_operations && fud) {
> > + mutex_lock(&fuse_mutex);
> > + fc = fud->fc;
> > + if (fc)
> > + fc = fuse_conn_get(fc);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fuse_mutex);
> > +
> > + if (fc) {
> > + res = fuse_reinit_conn(fc);
> > + fuse_conn_put(fc);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + break;
> > default:
> > res = -ENOTTY;
> > break;
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
> > index 1b9d0dfae72d..3dac67b25eae 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
> > @@ -989,6 +989,7 @@ struct fuse_notify_retrieve_in {
> > /* Device ioctls: */
> > #define FUSE_DEV_IOC_MAGIC 229
> > #define FUSE_DEV_IOC_CLONE _IOR(FUSE_DEV_IOC_MAGIC, 0, uint32_t)
> > +#define FUSE_DEV_IOC_REINIT _IO(FUSE_DEV_IOC_MAGIC, 0)
> >
> > struct fuse_lseek_in {
> > uint64_t fh;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists