[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230403041128.jrsvbm4ddxdyhddg@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 09:41:28 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix policy->freq_table is NULL in
__cpufreq_driver_target()
On 29-03-23, 21:36, Yajun Deng wrote:
> __resolve_freq() may be return target_freq if policy->freq_table is
> NULL. In this case, it should return -EINVAL before __target_index().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index c0e5be0fe2d6..308a3df1a940 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2299,7 +2299,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> return cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
> }
>
> - if (!cpufreq_driver->target_index)
> + if (!cpufreq_driver->target_index || !policy->freq_table)
> return -EINVAL;
Hi,
I have sent an alternate patch [1] for this, please try it.
--
viresh
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/53d4ed4e5b18a59a48790434f8146fb207e11c49.1680494945.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists