linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2023 13:11:12 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 10:14:36AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/4/23 10:06?AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 10:01:58AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>> Starting to get personal instead tends to not help to convince your
> >>>> reviewers that it's really useful in general.
> >>>
> >>> I know you and others like to talk a lot about what you want as
> >>> maintainers and reviewers - but I find that the people who are the
> >>> loudest and the most authoritarian in that respect tend not to be the
> >>> people who drive discussions forward in productive ways.
> >>
> >> One issue is certainly that nobody wants to engage with people that
> >> instantly try and make this personal, or just uncomfortable in general.
> > 
> > Yeah, you like to respond to technical discussion with a *plonk*.
> > 
> > *eyeroll*
> > 
> > Christoph can handle himself, he doesn't need you defending him.
> 
> I'm not defending Christoph, I'm trying to help YOU understand why
> your patchsets always turn sour. And I'm trying to get this toxicity off
> the list, because it's frankly not productive at all and it's hurting
> the developer environment for everybody else.
> 
> If everybody else seems like an asshole, maybe it's actually you? A
> little introspection would be prudent. If you can't change your tone,
> please just go somewhere else. I'm not interested.

Let's just leave this aside for now and talk about it at LSF.